Neither Complementarian nor Egalitarian


By Aimee Byrd - Posted at Housewife Theologian:

My spellcheck has never recognized complementarian as a real word. But in the circles I run in, I am considered extremely suspect if I don’t identify myself as one. It’s a fairly new term, coined less than thirty years ago. As I have been digging deeper into the movement behind this word, I am finding that it carries different implications depending on who is using it. I have been called a thin complementarian for questioning some teaching from the leaders of the movement that as a woman I am to be constantly looking for and nurturing men to lead me. (To which I responded here.)

Within the culture in the church today, many questions are still being asked about the equality of men and women and where and how women can serve. As I have been participating in this conversation, I feel like I need to continue to begin with my convictions that Scripture places the responsibility of the ordained office on particular, qualified men, so that I am not labeled a feminist and dismissed. While I’ve been working on a book project of my own on related issues, I have found this new book out from Michelle Lee-Barnewall, Neither Complementarian nor Egalitarian. In the conservative, Reformed-ish community, a title like that is like saying that you don’t identify as male or female. So of course I had to read it.

Read more...

See also:

Comments

Featured Posts:

How Quitting Facebook Helped Relieve My Depression And Made Me A Better Friend

Evangelist Sues Georgia Gov't After Being Banned From Preaching on Public Sidewalk

Is Social Media Making Christians Miserable?

Paula White Urges Followers to Give ‘First Fruits’ Offering of a Day, Week or Month’s Wages

China bombs megachurch in drive to silence Christianity